Event / publication / experimentBranchesAugust 2015

The replication crisis

Open Science CollaborationBrian Nosek

This page delivers no verdict; it presents claims and evidence with their sources. No theory in science is absolute. Method

For everyone

In 2015, 270 researchers repeated 100 psychology experiments published in respected journals. While 97% of the originals had reported significant results, only about 36% of the replications did. Similar problems were reported in medicine and economics. It became a strong example that scientific findings are not settled by a single study.

For specialists

Replication effect sizes were on average about half those of the originals. Main causes cited were publication bias, low statistical power, "p-hacking" (analytic flexibility) and HARKing (hypothesising after results are known). Gilbert and colleagues argued that differences in samples and protocols in the replications explained the low replication rate; the project authors responded.

Claims

Evidence

Supporting

Replication study

About 36% of the 100 replications gave statistically significant results, and effect sizes halved on average.[1]

Challenging

Methodological critique

It was argued that the replications used different populations and protocols from the originals, so the replication rate was underestimated.[2]

Connections

Sources

  1. ArticleOpen Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349, aac4716DOI 10.1126/science.aac4716archive
  2. ArticleGilbert, D. T.; King, G.; Pettigrew, S.; Wilson, T. D. (2016). Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". Science 351, 1037DOI 10.1126/science.aad7243archive

Search the literature

Look for scholarly work on this topic in other indexes:

Cite this page

APA

Athena contributors. (2026). The replication crisis. Athena: The tree of human knowledge. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://latifkedi.github.io/athena/en/d/tekrarlama-krizi/

BibTeX
@misc{athena_tekrarlama_krizi,
  title        = {The replication crisis},
  author       = {{Athena contributors}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://latifkedi.github.io/athena/en/d/tekrarlama-krizi/}},
  note         = {Athena: The tree of human knowledge. Accessed: 2026-11-01}
}

Added: September 27, 2026 · Last changed: September 27, 2026 · Page history

✎ Suggest a correction